Search for: "State v. Rank"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
[What Swift v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am
” Yesterday was the 43rd anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:16 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:30 am
The facts of the case can be gathered from the judgment, being linked here.In the SLP before the Supreme Court, the Union of India has stated: "If the benefit of reservation is denied to an SC/ST/OBC candidate who qualifies on merit, then there can be a situation where a lower ranked OBC candidate gets allocated to a better service than a higher ranked OBC candidate only because the higher ranked candidate performed well enough to qualify in the… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Writers were not high-ranked in Roman society. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court in a single case: Reisch v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:48 am
The Court of Appeals addressed this question in Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Hurst v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:00 pm
The case is Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:51 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:02 am
Yes.The case is Morin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
In fact, it’s really about a lot more than where the fourth factor ranks. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:48 pm
In addition, earlier this year the United States Supreme Court addressed relational discrimination in the Thompson v. [read post]
