Search for: "State v. Rank"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 10:50 am
Cape Coral-Fort Myers ranked No. 8. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:34 am
Valeo and Citizens United v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Circuit pointedly observed in its seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Having weak links in the ranks is a bad idea, and washing people out is necessary. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am
The media has commented on the escalating tension with China with the BBC highlighting Chinese state media criticising comments made by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm
They compare it to Clinton Administration Solicitor General Drew Days' famous mistake in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Article 37 of the UCMJ prohibits such commanders from using their rank and position to unduly influence the course of the trial, the witnesses or the accused, the judge or panel members, and the prosecutor and defense counsel. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
State of Punjab and Ors. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 8:16 am
A federal district court, citing those allegations, has denied the employer’s motion to dismiss the hostile work environment claim, as well as claims for discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, the ADEA, and Pennsylvania state law (Murphy v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Broad rank-and-file support for bills negotiated almost exclusively by Senate and House leadership is dwindling as members of Congress voice diverging views on the next appropriate step in addressing the pandemic. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:29 pm
In a 3-2 decision, decided on April 30, 2020, in Hawaiiusa Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:29 pm
In a 3-2 decision, decided on April 30, 2020, in Hawaiiusa Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
