Search for: "State v. Robins" Results 841 - 860 of 1,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 8:21 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF: MC, HC and CC, Minor Children, DL, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
In the first part, instead, we look at the situation in the US, thanks to a research paper published yesterday by Sara Jeruss, Robin Feldman and Thomas Ewing, which analyses 13.000 patent cases from recent years (2007-2008 and 2011-2012). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:30 pm
A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats, Robin Frazer Clark President, State Bar of Georgia robinclark@gatriallawyers.net [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:49 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: VILLAGE ROAD COALITION v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Writing in the Guardian Patrick Butler pointed out that whereas the recent turnaround which saw families with disabled children being exempted was vaunted as a gesture towards decency and common sense, it was in fact the case that the government had been forced into an embarrassing climb down in the case of Gorry v Wiltshire and the Secretary of State where they fought tooth and nail to not have disabled children exempted. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v  Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
This decision is notable for its application of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) pleading standard, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in BellAtlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:09 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF RB, STATE OF WYOMING, by and through the office of the PARK COUNTY ATTORNEY v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
In this case, respondent Myriad Genetics holds a patent on two genes, mutations in which are correlated with a higher risk of breast or ovarian cancer, in their “isolated” state. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:33 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Jill E. [read post]