Search for: "State v. Rodriguez" Results 841 - 860 of 1,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
In this week’s second opinion, in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm by Ron Skolrood
One of their principal arguments was that the Supreme Court of Canada had already definitively decided the issue in the previous case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:42 am by Susan Brenner
 He filed a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment, claiming it “fails to state an offense. [read post]