Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 841 - 860 of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I believe that it is, notwithstanding the suggestion by Justice Sotomayor (in a concurrence last year in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contractKito v Board of Educ. of William Floyd School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 08459, Decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentBernard J. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Many thanks to the blog readers who forwarded the parties' briefs from Yabsley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 The 79-page complaint (full text) in Yeshiva Gedola Na’os Yaakov, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Child Evangelism Fellowship NORCAL, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
They alleged that they have common law vested rights to develop commercial uses on their property, and raised claims of laches, “easement rights” to commercially develop their property, state constitutional violations, and violations of federal equal protection and due process under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:40 am by Marie-Amélie George
Fifty-five years later, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:50 am by Nicole Mazzocco
  The GPTA sets forth the parameters for determining taxable values of real property, and it specifies that when a property has been transferred, it must be valued at the state equalized valuation for the calendar year following the transfer. [read post]