Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 841 - 860
of 864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Strickland ((07-689), but found the inquiry confusing, frustrating and inconclusive. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Similarly, if someone’s cat does not roam outdoors, it can remain unaltered.SB 250 does not cost the state any money. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bear in mind, we're talking about such minimal competence as to meet the criteria of Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
The case, known as Furman v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:41 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
Ted Strickland, GovernorSo they tried to kill [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
In response, the D.A.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
”); Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D355bCriminal law -- Jurors -- Peremptory challenge -- Gender discrimination -- State's explanation that it had a bad feeling about juror was not a valid gender-neutral explanation for strike of last male on panel -- Trial court erred in upholding strike based upon fact that state had struck an equal number of male and female jurors -- It is improper for court to consider overall makeup of jurors that have been seated in determining sufficiency of gender-neutral reason… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
His Honour stated: “At first glance, it therefore appears [under s106B(2) and s80(1)] that the Court could very well have the power to make the order charging the husband’s mother’s property if the Court is satisfied after a trial of the orders sought pursuant to s106B should be made and that the husband’s mother should be ordered to repay the money directly to the wife rather than the husband,… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
