Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 3,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm by jonathanturley
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:33 am by Mila Sohoni
The justices initially wanted Wall to explain how the government could reconcile its position in this case with its earlier position in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 5:07 am by Susan Brenner
The court also stated that he would order the United States Probation Office to clean the hard drive before returning computer to [Spink]. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA) provides in pertinent part:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.DOMA is a pretty nasty law, depriving… [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm by Deeptak Gupta
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:43 pm by Rory Little
In a succinct six-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled today in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States with Pam Karlin (SLS). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am by Mark Walsh
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]