Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 14,807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 11:04 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
New Jersey employment law has some of the strongest employee protections in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
The decision was premised on a strong affirmation of the right to acquire property. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm by johntfloyd
Supreme this past January 23rd in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Today we are adding three more cases to this mix in order to ensure that strong, well-resourced cases are presented to the federal appeals courts most likely to give the issue a fair hearing.One of the new cases is Whitewood v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which it will consider the scope of its 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
While the Secretary of State’s decision could be judicially reviewable, it would not be appropriate for a national court to substitute its own assessment for the decision of the member states which constituted the committee. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:50 am by tracey
Merchant International Co Ltd v Natsionalna Aktsionerna Kompaniia Naftogaz Ukrainy: [2012] EWCA Civ 196;  [2012] WLR (D)  51 “An English court was entitled to consider whether a foreign judgment obtained in a Convention state had contravened the Human Rights Convention where there was strong factual evidence to rebut the presumption that the procedures of other Convention states complied with article 6. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
What should we make of the report—and the strong reactions to it? [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
It is generally accepted that the more a decision lies in the “macro-political” field the less intrusive will be the court’s supervision (R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
It led to a strong judicial slapdown of the Department of Justice by one of our nation's leading jurists, in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am by Kate Fort
Ed. 2d 561 (1963) (noting that Acts of Congress have “strong presumptive validity’); State v. [read post]