Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 16,373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by INFORRM
The Court emphasized the importance of interpreting such cases liberally to safeguard constitutional freedoms and legitimate political discourse, stating that strong political convictions and impassioned words may not necessarily signify seditious intent. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For Vermeule, the common good requires a strong administrative state under modern conditions, as long as it is operating for good results, and it is difficult to contend that the SEC is not acting to [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am by Jennifer Lynch
Montana’s success in passing mostly reasonable privacy laws, many of which offer strong protections lacking in other, much larger states’ laws, shows that concerns about privacy easily cut across political lines. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
Poverty is both the cause and the symptom of human rights abuses across the world and without strong, legislative action, this will only worsen. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Tristan Marot
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Edward T. Kang
Rule 408 Precludes Some Settlement Evidence From Being Admitted The Federal Rule of Evidence 408 is the model for many state court rules. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am by Allen L. Harris
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]