Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 7,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
This balance was sorely tested in a meticulously analyzed decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
It states that: “No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
/ppnbsp;/ppIt is worth noting that some detainees' lawyers successfully argued their causes in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Canal Auth. of State of Fla. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Located in the heartland of the United States, these states enjoy abundant access to traditional and renewable energy resources. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Competing union interestsBuffalo CSD v Local 264, 270 AD2d 814Suppose an arbitration award in favor of an employee in one collective bargaining unit adversely affects an employee of the same employer in another collective bargaining unit. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:41 am
MHCS v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
Strong On October 28, 2011, a dissenting opinion regarding the preliminary decision on jurisdiction and admissibility was issued in the ground-breaking case of Abaclat (formerly Beccara) v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am
The result in Snyder v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
[T]he United States has a strong interest in ensuring the detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility have meaningful access to counsel to pursue their habeas rights, and as the record establishes, from January through May of this year, over 193 attorney visits were scheduled and, from March through May of this year, approximately 100 calls between detainees and counsel have occurred, almost as many that occurred in all of 2012. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm
Specifically with respect to Saudi Arabia, Congress might require the President to determine that A) Saudi Arabia continues to be a reliable ally of the United States and partner in combating international terrorism; and B) Saudi Arabia is taking strong actions to prevent support inside and outside Saudi Arabia for religious extremism. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
Evans to United State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States—was its last full opinion of the October 2023 Term. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987), left unresolved by an equally divided Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:52 pm
The court cites Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:25 am
" In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Jamshidi concludes that Iran has a strong claim that terrorism exceptions violate the customary international law rules governing state immunity. [read post]
