Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2024, 11:41 am
The court just agreed to this last Wednesday; here's the earlier panel decision (Henderson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Students have received visits from a range of notables including Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am
Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling, that technology may soon be turned against people seeking abortions, the people who support them, and the workers who provide reproductive healthcare. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:12 pm
Mashal has been admitted to the bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:36 am
There's nothing special about DSK's ability to flee. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:26 pm
" People in the end are too entranced with their own self-interest to self-monitor. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:45 pm
A teenager in Douglas County who had consensual sex with a younger classmate was given a 20-year prison sentence (the state Supreme Court ruled that was cruel and unusual punishment and ordered his release). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
"This decision is not about letting people go; it's about refocusing our resources," says managing partner Beth Ugoretz. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Brigham Young University, 108 F.3d 1388 (10th Cir. 1997) (“[a]s a federal court, we are reticent to expand state law in the absence of clear guidance from Utah's highest court, or at least a strong and well-reasoned trend among other courts which Utah might find persuasive, in favor of such expansion”). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
In this respect, this case seems to set an important new precedent, unless it's overturned by the Supreme Court.) [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:57 am
For example, in 2000, due to the case of Pustejovsky versus Rapid-American Corp., Texas' Supreme Court rules that someone affected by asbestos could sue more than once. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
More to the point, as the Supreme Court clarified in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
In this respect, this case seems to set an important new precedent, unless it's overturned by the Supreme Court.) [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
The bill became rather contentious at times, but ultimately passed with an amendment requiring the State Supreme Court to study the issue of non-lawyer services for immigrants. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:47 am
It doesn't actually have to obey it.Or maybe it does.The 6th Circuit put it this way.As the district court found, whether slight or significant deviations from the protocol occur, the State's ongoing conduct requires the federal courts to monitor every execution on an ad hoc basis, because the State cannot be trusted to fulfill its otherwise lawful duty to execute inmates sentenced to death.Which is really quite an… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
’ Generally only idle people, pursuing ‘idle curiosity’ have time to visit court rooms in person. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
”; “How do lawyer’s reason? [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
That issue will be going back to the Supreme Court this year. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 7:38 am
Never take a plea deal, IMO, it's not a deal, and they use it to scare the hell out of people so they do take the deals. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Anybody who caught the flu (other vaccines/drugs seemed to fall by the wayside) would receive medical monitoring monthly (the Ohio Supreme Court has never recognized medical monitoring in any context – let alone as a remedy for consumer fraud). [read post]
