Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In response, California DA's have been active in trying create a statute of limitations for discipline offenses.] [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
California, 16-894, has been relisted a second time this week.) [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
And those aren't my words, they're Justice Rehnquist's in U.S. v Security Industries Bank. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
Plaintiff in Schaefer v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 7:30 am
Alabama – Lesser Offense Instruction Wrongly Denied by Trial Court, Feb. 14, 2015, Alabama Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:07 pm
Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 7:30 am
Alabama – Lesser Offense Instruction Wrongly Denied by Trial Court, Feb. 14, 2015, Alabama Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
Plaintiff in Schaefer v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 5:39 am
California v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:34 am
California v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
California v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Harris began to take intermittent FMLA leave. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
This case asks whether two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels can be combined for regulatory takings analysis under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
I rate this a likely grant, and the odds are good the court is simply taking the extra week to check for vehicle problems and deciding which of the two to take (although it could take both and consolidate). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:18 am
Later in the evening at their home, [Rocio] decided to take a nap because she had duty the next day. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
On the heels of Patel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
And Petitioners have a pending motion to intervene in another case challenging the Rule in the Northern District of California, which means that when all is said and done they will have been subjected to all three approaches that the courts of appeals take to adequacy of representation. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
(Maybe sex offenses, but maybe also drug offenses; many parents might not want their children to fall in with the wrong crowd online and be exposed to bad influences.) [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Kobach v. [read post]
