Search for: "Tea v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
If I do some revisions, then go have a cup of tea before returning to make other revisions, have I created two different “versions” entitled to separate copyright protection? [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm
Calm down boys and read the judgment over a nice cup of tea. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
"Consider this: The 1954 Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:47 am
From Gogol v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
— in California v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
Given the statutory ambiguities, readers may wonder why the Park Service’s reading of ANILCA and its own enabling acts would not be entitled to deference from the Supreme Court under Chevron v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Westerman said that if there's a notification on the outside of the envelope stating that it relates to a lawsuit people will be more likely to open it. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Opponents of the Act argue that this is like United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 7:33 pm
Pundits have tried to read the tea leaves following the argument in the Supreme Court in Garland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
Fricke v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
True, Ely himself thought Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In addition, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In addition, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:01 pm
(In District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
November Reasonably Suspicious Podcast: Let me be your lawyer dog, or I won't be your man at all ...
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
