Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
In Akorita v 36 Gensing Road Ltd LRX/16/2008 (.pdf), the Lands Tribunal considered whether or not the Appellant had been properly served with a notice under s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Last month, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion in Town of Kearny v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:03 pm
New York State Senator Bill Perkins has filed an amicus brief in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:39 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Next, we have s.124: (1) Where a notice under s. 122 (…) has been served by the tenant, the landlord shall, unless the notice is withdrawn, serve on the tenant … a written notice either - (a) admitting his right, or (b) denying it and stating the reasons why, in the opinion of the landlord, the tenant does not have the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Next, we have s.124: (1) Where a notice under s. 122 (…) has been served by the tenant, the landlord shall, unless the notice is withdrawn, serve on the tenant … a written notice either - (a) admitting his right, or (b) denying it and stating the reasons why, in the opinion of the landlord, the tenant does not have the right to buy. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet Supreme Court cases—especially the 1991 ruling in Gregory v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
In Hillstone Restaurant Group v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:15 pm
That the tenant had the easiest opportunity to view the state of repair of the common areas. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
’ State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:22 am
It is important that the date is correct as is shown in the case of McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
He dismissed the argument advanced for the landlord that as the Act stated that the application could be made by 'the tenant' it could only be made during the currency of the tenancy and not after it had ended. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
He dismissed the argument advanced for the landlord that as the Act stated that the application could be made by 'the tenant' it could only be made during the currency of the tenancy and not after it had ended. [read post]
