Search for: "The New England Divisions Case" Results 841 - 860 of 860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
Although he really hates real names that start so pretentiously with lower case letters, the IPKat is still willing to give you his thoughts on esure International Ltd v Direct Line Insurance plc [2007] EWHC 1557 (Ch), a decision last Friday from Mr Justice Lindsay in the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales - and you can read the decision in full on BAILII.Direct Line provided insurance and financial services direct to the public, mainly via online,… [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
  In such an accident the limitation period for all potential heads of damage would commence as soon as he or she recognized that he or she suffered damage to their vehicle; despite the fact that other heads of damages may not be discovered until after the expiration of the limitation period.Terry Robertson, Q.C. and I argued a case called Craig v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
A good example is Sayers and others v Smithkline Beecham plc and others, an England and Wales Queen's Bench Division last Wednesday from Mr Justice Keith, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' All England digests.The United States Department of Health and Human Services was involved in US proceedings in which it was alleged that the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and MR (measles, rubella) vaccinations in young children helped cause autism. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:04 am
If it isn't, the new and generous damages provisions of the IP Enforcement Directive 2004/48 should do the trick. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
The bad news was that, by November 2003, no more than a trivial reputation, if any, remained in the Mythbusters name and he had insufficient goodwill upon which to launch a passing-off action.The IPKat is enchanted by this. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:42 pm
In a supplemental decision and order, the Board determined the Respondent shall pay three discriminatees $286,411 in backpay and make payments on behalf of the three individuals to the New England Pension Fund totaling $45,459. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:10 pm
  Which would be better for the Appellate Division? [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:12 pm
No need to repeat yourself, says Merpel.Right: without wanting to stick his neck out, the IPKat ventures to predict that interest in news and comment concerning IP continues to grow.What's in the March 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases, the IPKat hears you ask. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Baby M Case: the Complete Trial Transcripts - Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
Another little IP gem from online subscription service LexisNexis Butterworths is the Chancery Division for England and Wales decision on Monday of Mr Justice Patten in Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd, so far unreported on BAILII.This was an application by Boehringer for ex parte interim injunctive relief to stop Vetplus publishing an advertisement and a press release in various journals relating to one of its products. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:50 pm
APPEAL A request for new consideration of a lawsuit by a higher court. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:30 pm
This mouthful, in more ways than one, was decided in the Chancery Division on Wednesday 28 February by Mr Justice Kitchin. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, Partisan Entrenchment in the Civil Rights Division (Aug. 2, 2006)42. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 4:09 am
Louis, Emory, Rochester, Carnegie-Mellon and Case Western Reserve. [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 12:56 am
Dyson: the Advocate General speaksAdvocate General Leger gave his Opinion yesterday in European Court of Justice Case C‑321/03, Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks, a reference for a preliminary ruling on a point of trade mark law from the High Court for England and Wales.Since 1993 Dyson has made and sold its Dual Cyclone vacuum cleaner, a bagless cleaner in which the dirt and dust is collected in a transparent plastic container forming part of the machine. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
It is aptly named The Texas Law The writer Bryan Owens is a Texas lawyer with a New England upbringing and a degree from Harvard University undergrad and Loyola Law. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 12:59 am
The questions referred to the ECJ by the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales are:1.In a situation where an applicant has used a sign (which is not a shape) which consists of a feature which has a function and which forms part of the appearance of a new kind of article, and the applicant has, until the date of application, had a de facto monopoly in such articles, is it sufficient, in order for the sign to have acquired a distinctive character within… [read post]