Search for: "The People v. Wells"
Results 841 - 860
of 30,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
(Reporters for other newspapers wouldn't be, either, but they may well be less interested in cases within that community.) [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But the most well-known case that stands for the same proposition is the one that settled the 2000 presidential election: Bush v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:37 am
He might well be fine with that. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:12 pm
Eolas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm
(The opinion contains 27 pages.)But the parties care, some random other people care, and it's a federal appeal, so Judge Ikuta spells it all out for anyone interested.At least now, when someone asks you what sorts of appeals the Ninth Circuit hears, you can say: "Well, orders of the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:39 am
"If he's 'anti-hunt,' well, you can be 'hunt,'" Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
In Rucho v Common Cause, 588 U.S. ____ (2019), the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:51 am
In Rich v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
This is an important statement because many people, such as the majority of the Federal Circuit panel in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
The plaintiffs run several well-known databases, such as infoUSA and Salesgenie. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:57 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:18 am
It's another case in which Guam has attempted to run an election in which (essentially) only Chamorro people can vote. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 3:17 am
By now, most people are familiar with the concept of pre-nuptial agreements. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
The remedy is coupons (well, "vouchers") for free popcorn that the plaintiffs' attorneys will no doubt seek to value at full price, though the vouchers are unlikely to be fully used. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As Chief Justice Morawetz enters his 5th year as head of the Ontario Superior Court, it is both appropriate and necessary (given the court’s acknowledged culture of complacency) to ask “how well is he overseeing court operations? [read post]
