Search for: "The View, LLC" Results 841 - 860 of 14,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit continues its apparent vacation -- only one published opinion since December 28, 2018 -- but. fortunately, the California Court of Appeal continues to crank things out.This opinion takes a very restrictive view of the litigation privilege. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:40 am by The Estrin Report
ESI: easily load all your data on one review platform Navigating: how to navigate your data Viewing: viewing your images and electronic documents Sorting Techniques: making viewing easier Searching: finding the needle in the haystack... [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 10:15 pm
Farina, President of Urban Residential Appraisal, LLC. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:05 pm by Carter Ruml
” In the court’s view, the charging order remedy in F.S. 608.433(4)  meant that a “judgment creditor cannot defeat the rights of nondebtor members of an LLC to withhold consent to the transfer of management rights” but did not “support an interpretation which gives a judgment creditor of the sole owner of an LLC less extensive rights than the rights that are freely assignable by the judgment debtor. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:20 pm by Paul Caron
Kenya JH Smith (Southern), Purposeful Ambiguity: A Case for Greater Clarity in State Law Treatment of the Nonprofit Limited Liability Company (as Viewed through Permitted Purpose Provisions), 95 Tul. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Stenda Realty, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Answer in first comment].In re IBrand Accessories LLC, Serial No. 86185362 (June 29, 2015) [not precedential] [Refusal to register BULLETPROOF SCREEN PROTECTOR for "display screen protectors for providing shade and privacy specially adapted to electronic devices, namely, laptops, cell phones, and personal digital assistants" [SCREEN PROTECTOR disclaimed], in view of the registered mark BULLET-PROOF SHIELDS for "protective sheet for covering laptop computers, MP3… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
"] In re My Happi Gift LLC, Serial No. 97118213 (September 8, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
Well, your would-be honor, try your skills on these four appeals, keeping in mind that, by my estimate, about 85% of Section 2(d) refusals are affirmed by the Board.In re Chicken Pickers, LLC, Serial No. 85593576 (March 4, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:39 am
[Refusal to register NUTRITIONAL CONCEPTS for "retail and wholesale on-line and store services featuring dietary and nutritional supplements, and for "personalized nutritional counseling services," in view of the registered mark NUTRITION CONCEPTS for "nutrition counseling services"].In re The Jockey Club LLC , Serial No. 85595169 (April 24, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
[Answer will be found in first comment].In re Restoque Int’l LLC, Serial No. 86548859 (February 22, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:48 am
[Note: see the case TTABlogged here].In re Moll Anderson Productions, LLC, Serial No. 85777948 (December 10, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:49 am
In re Moxley Homes, LLC, Serial Nos. 88882171 and 88882239 (February 11, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:05 am
May 23, 2018 - 11 AM: In re American Cruise Lines, Inc., Serial No. 87040022 [Section 2(d) refusal of AMERICAN CONSTELLATION for "Cruise ship services; transportation of passengers by ship; arranging and conducting cruises for others" [CONSTELLATION disclaimed], in view of the registered marks CONSTELLATION and CELEBRITY CONSTELLATION, registered by the same owner for "cruise ship services, arranging and conducting cruises for others, and transportation of passengers by… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
In his judgment in Davidoff v Google LLC ([2023] EWHC 1958 (KB)) Nicklin J has comprehensively restated the principles to be applied on Norwich Pharmacal applications, emphasising the importance of balancing the Convention rights of the applicant and those of the alleged wrongdoer. [read post]