Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Aug. 25, 2011) (unpublished), the United States District Court, Northern District of California, dismissed a class action securities fraud complaint against Hansen Medical Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
District Court Northern District of California, third superseding indictment, 7/28/20 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
District Court Northern District of California, third superseding indictment, 7/28/20 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
District Court Northern District of California, third superseding indictment, 7/28/20 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
District Court Northern District of California, third superseding indictment, 7/28/20 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California Judges have ruled in class actions. [read post]
18 May 2016, 10:53 am
Earlier this month, the District Court for the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss a class action alleging that Facebook had unlawfully collected biometric data. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of California and U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Federal Judge James Ware of the Northern District of California has certified a class of iPod purchasers, allowing an antitrust class action to proceed against Apple Computer, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of employees in a wage suppression “no employee solicitation” antitrust case in In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, Case No.: 11-CV-02509, 2013 U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
The Home Builders Association of Northern California and other industry groups (collectively Home Builders") challenge the designation by the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 pm
On Jan. 9, a federal judge in the Northern District of California issued a nationwide injunction against the shuttering of the DACA program and ordered the Trump administration to continue accepting renewal applications for DACA. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
District Court for the Northern California entered a Consent Decree and Order for Civil Penalties, Injunction and Other Relief against a mobile apps developer, W3 Innovations LLC, and its owner, Justin Maples.There are several commentaries about this that immediately jump to mind. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) created a multidistrict litigation site in the Northern District of California for lawsuits alleging injury against Pfizer from the use of Viagra. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:53 am
District Court for the Northern District of California ordered a 14-unit Subway franchisee in the San Francisco Bay Area to either close or sell their stores. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Of note, I just stumbled across an insightful UCL certification opinion out the Northern District addressing the issue of predominance, post Tobacco II. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California 2005). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
Abraham Bielski filed a putative class action against Coinbase, Inc. in the United States District Court: Northern District of California, alleging that Coinbase failed to replace funds fraudulently taken from users’ accounts. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:29 pm
International Mutual Legal Assistance (Civil Matters) Rogatory Letter Letter of Request Convention of March 18, 1970, on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters Discovery (Switzerland) Evidence Request from theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California Vaud (CH), Tribunal cantonal, Chambre des recours civile CREC 11 mai… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
District court for the Northern District of California denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification because the proposed class did not satisfy Rule 23’s ascertainability and predominance requirements. [read post]
