Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Golden West Foreclosure Service, Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:52 am
" "Use of a mark that is the subject of an application alleging a bona fide intent to use is not required until the application files a statement of use. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:14 am
” In eSnipe, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
In addition to the exciting news reported yesterday about Dominos Pizza, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:08 pm
Marco & Sons, Inc., 55 USPQ2d 1298, 1300 (TTAB 2000) Interestingly, however, if Plaintiff has a bona fide intent to use the same mark for related goods, and is about to file an intent-to-use application to register the mark, and believes registration of the mark will be refused in view of respondent's registration, this satisfies the "damaged" requirement. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
"Use" of a mark means the bona fide use of such mark made in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. ... [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:43 pm
Philip Morris, Inc., 899 F.2d 1575, 14 USPQ2d 1390 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
Note that these men used the words “bona fide,” meaning good faith, and not words like “valid” or “necessary. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:40 am
Svcs., Inc., 371 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2004). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:23 am
CK Ventures Inc., FA0911001294457 (Nat. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:15 am
When domain names are appropriately used they qualify as bona fide offerings of services. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:20 am
Vertical Axis, Inc, D2008-0598 (WIPO July 29, 2008). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:45 pm
©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
It is not out of the question that could have been used for the bona fide offering of goods or services, but the circumstantial evidence supports targeting. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:24 am
“Something more than the operation of a landing or PPC page is required to show lack of bona fide use,” Starmail Distributors Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Taking advantage of the recognition that a complainant has created for its mark is not a bona fide offering of goods or services, but there has to be proof of targeting not simply an allegation, Target Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:44 am
” The Trademark Act defines “use in commerce” as the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:05 am
In the ruling, the panel found that: The Respondent has never used or made preparations to use the disputed domain names in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:28 am
As other Panels have repeatedly held, a respondent’s use of a disputed domain name to offer competing services on the resolving website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services” citing Carey Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
