Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 841 - 860 of 1,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed  in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 2:02 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Here, the lawyers obtained $1.2 million for the plaintiff and her minor child in a lawsuit against the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
Virginia, the 1967 United States Supreme Court case that struck down state bans on interracial marriage. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
Secretary of State John Kerry and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm by James Kachmar
  Congress, in enacting section 201(e), wanted “to reaffirm the basic principle that the United States copyright of an individual author shall be secured to that author, and cannot be taken away by any involuntary transfer. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
  On Junuary 16, 2013 Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton stated as follows: U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Yesterday, after the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the case of Burwell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:22 am by Margaret Wood
”  This proclamation references the 2013 case heard by the United States Supreme Court, Windsor v. [read post]