Search for: "United States v. Dean"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska instructed the jury that it must find Dean had violated Section 14(a) and Rule 14a-9 if the SEC had proven Dean had “solicited proxies by means of false or misleading proxy statements by negligently approving or signing publicly filed proxy statements. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska instructed the jury that it must find Dean had violated Section 14(a) and Rule 14a-9 if the SEC had proven Dean had “solicited proxies by means of false or misleading proxy statements by negligently approving or signing publicly filed proxy statements. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:00 am
David Cay Johnston (Syracuse), Manufacturing Tax Break Gone Wild, 140 Tax Notes 621 (Aug. 5, 2013): A federal judge [United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
” As simply stated in Seran v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
He ordered Verizon to turn over “telephony metadata”—essentially call logs—of all calls in which at least one party was in the United States; and he forbade Verizon from informing its customers that their phone activity (though not the content of their conversations) would be shared with the government in this way. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
United States, a case regarding damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
