Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Also on Wednesday it will hear the appeal of Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs involving whether the Foreign Secretary was entitled to allow Mr Youssef to be added to the United Nations’ list of people subject to asset freezing. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Center at Santa Clara University in the United States, questions that approach to regulating the Internet. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm
Senator Howard’s language filled that gap: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The World Trademark Review's blog caught the Kat's eye earlier this week with news that President Barack Obama has taken time off from his golfing commitments to nominate a new IP czar (technically "Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator"), Kilpatrick Townsend's Daniel Marti, though Merpel thinks he got back to the links in time to avoid choosing a new Director for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:17 am
Originally, Nokia sued in two countries -- the United States and Germany -- in late April and early May 2012. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 12:26 pm
United States and Germany Compared with EnglandIII. 'Quaker' CompaniesIV. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
K 5410 T6 L65 2011 Transnational torture : law, violence, and state power in the United States and India Jinee Lokaneeta. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
While arms advanced considerably from medieval England through the nineteenth-century United States, bans on particular types of arms were rare. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm
He then examined our own rich jurisprudence on the issue – the leading case being Independent Newspapers v Minister for Intelligence. [read post]
