Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
" Justice Sotomayor explains further: The Supreme Court of the United States declares that a particular kind of business, though open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
On August 31, 2004, in F. v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 17341/03, June 22, 2004), the application of a gay Iranian man was declared inadmissible both in relation to violations of Articles 3 and 8 ECHR. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs Religious Liberty? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
In Perry et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
In states where gay couples are allowed to marry, the costs for just about everything family-law related is higher. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:48 am
Joey Fishkin’s post on Jack’s book poses a fascinating and provocative question: “Is this book really about faith in something like the project of the United States — its ideals, its promise, its commitments, its possible future redemption — rather than just the Constitution? [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
In the case United States of America v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 9:28 am
(Ask yourself if the United States could reinstitute slavery by adding a new amendment proposed and ratified in accordance with the procedures set out in Article V.)Still, the obvious question is whether such determinations are better made by ostensible "experts," whether in law, philosophy, or whatever, or by "we the people" engaging in what Publics might have called 'reflection and choice" about an issue of fundamental importance,… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
The lawyers for both sides made the list of top 100 influential lawyers in the United States by the National Law Journal. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
Lawrence overruled “one of the most harmful Supreme Court decisions in lesbian and gay law,” Bowers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, State v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am
The United States Constitution trumps United States code and state constitutions. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
(The full text of the decision in Humig v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
United States, and Smith v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled the Act — which imposes harsher punishments for individuals who commit violent acts on individuals due to their sexual orientation — was constitutional, and did not suppress anti-gay speech. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
Ohio (though query what effect United States v. [read post]
