Search for: "United States v. Guest" Results 841 - 860 of 2,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:27 am
United States, 294 U.S. 382 (1935)) The seaman supported his motion by referring to the vessel's log, which stated that he was "last seen aboard the ship at 9:00 AM March 1st, 1928. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
According to markings on these documents, the e-mails were printed on August 8, 2009, in the United States. 85. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Kelly Buchanan
Statutes at Large, v. 8, at 444) was terminated by the United States because of Russia’s discriminatory immigration policies. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael
While their audiences are truly international, most social networks are based in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Nabiha Syed
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — federal court authority to require the government to transfer guns seized from an individual without a legal right to have a gun Tibble v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Based on recent Federal Circuit decisions (Superior Industries v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am by Léon Dijkman
Ericsson also asked for and obtained an indemnity in case the Wuhan Court fines Ericsson for participating in its US case or asserting its United States patent rights for the amount of the fine. [read post]