Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 841 - 860 of 1,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:14 am by David Post
The basic framework was set out by the Supreme Court last year in the case of Walker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Steven M. Taber
The Noise Control Act contains the finding that “The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:47 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 100, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:50 pm by Steven M. Taber
Aviation statutes specifically state that “[t]he United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:15 pm by Immigration Prof
Cesar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández’s CrImmigration.com blog recently posted a helpful analysis of United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
In this regard paper refers to established mediation practices that can be found in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and also Greece, with its recent introduction of mediation. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm by William Weinberg
Just last month (December 2015) The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear cases from Minnesota and North Dakota where refusing a chemical test upon an arrest for DUI is charged as a crime separate from the driving under the influence charge. [read post]
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]