Search for: "United States v. Muslim" Results 841 - 860 of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
The cases described in the text involve courts passing judgment on communities within the United States, usually based on affidavits by litigants coupled with conve [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm by Alex Potcovaru
United States on the basis of the political question doctrine actually violates the requirements of the Torture Victim Prevention Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The United States has confirmed that Junaid Hussain, an ISIS recruiter and hacker, was killed Tuesday in a targeted U.S. airstrike. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Yet, as the chapter in Wrestling with Diversity attests to, in the United States the latter is treated with more magnanimity by state officials because it is considered religious. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:54 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Given the current state of affairs with the attempted ban on Muslims by Executive Order and given the President’s attempt to “blame” the Courts for simply upholding the United States Constitution, there has never been a more important time in our Country’s history than for the people to have total access to the courts through livestreaming or video. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:54 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Given the current state of affairs with the attempted ban on Muslims by Executive Order and given the President’s attempt to “blame” the Courts for simply upholding the United States Constitution, there has never been a more important time in our Country’s history than for the people to have total access to the courts through livestreaming or video. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Llanso: reminds her of Innocence of Muslims. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
The new Sec. 1041 provides that the Defense Secretary “may not use any of the amounts authorized” in the new law  ”"or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to release into the United States, its territories, or possessions, any individual…who is not a citizen of the United States, and is in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense, or otherwise under… [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
Among the claimant’s views are that Muslims should be forcibly deported from the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:33 pm
” It added: “While [they] understandably do not wish to be released to their home country, the fact that the United States has yet to identify an appropriate alternative country to taked them does not mean that the government is in violation of the Court’s order. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot  be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]