Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 841 - 860 of 1,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
  These products are larger containers or packages of a product that typically it has offered to customers at a cost savings per unit. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:24 am by Eloise Le Santo
But the United Kingdom could, in one way or another, provide her with funds for her legal proceedings in Indonesia. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:44 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The latter happened recently in Sanchez v CleanNet USA Inc.. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
Consequently, Gunter contests only the search of his data files conducted in the United States by U.S. officials.U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]