Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property" Results 841 - 860 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
", Dennis Crouch says that this view has been advanced by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in its recent proposed guidelines. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
Scope of Relief Under Rule 23 Certain objectors as well as the United States argue that the ASA will improperly use Rule 23 to shape a “forward looking” business arrangement that would release claims not before the Court. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  This order shall not in any manner affect title or interest to any real property held by either party or both jointly. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:12 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That might include earnings from stocks and dividends, distributions from a pension, annuity, profit-sharing or stock bonus plan, canceled debts and certain real estate transactions. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
She was required to pay all carrying costs with respect to this property. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am by Dan Harris
This protection is not based on abstract property rights arising under intellectual property law. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
(the Abraham LP): 15% The Partnership Agreement provided that the Partnership “shall continue until November 30, 2030” except upon “mutual written consent of the Partners to terminate and dissolve,” the “sale or other divestiture of all or substantially all real estate or interest in real estate held or owned by the Partnership,” or certain other events. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
The new rule would expand the authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which reviews real estate transactions near sensitive U.S. government property, in response to national security concerns about Chinese purchases near U.S. military bases. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
In this decision, the Supreme Court said in substance that the Negro is not a citizen of the United States; he is merely property, subject to the dictates of his owner. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Gene Quinn
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
(For a post-United Foods version of this problem, see Eric Goldman's post on Langdon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]