Search for: "Walter v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
One is a short piece by two military judges discussing United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 3:27 am
Marion County Election Bd. will be argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Gannett, 529 So.2d 595 (1988) that explains:PLB Grain owned one of the largest, if not the largest, grain storage facilities in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 6:27 am
(They are the same reporters who broke the Walter Reed story in February.) [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
In 1998, the CAFC issued the State Street v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
Supreme Court was reasonably similar in this respect... before Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm by Steve
Here's an excellent summary by Jesse Walker, which includes some examples...In December 1961, Walter and Victor Reuther of the United Auto Workers, together with the liberal lawyer Joseph Rauh, wrote a 24-page memorandum to Atty. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence "Hearing Ordered Into Audibility of Recording Offered as Proof of Bribes' Acceptance" United States v. [read post]