Search for: "dev"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 6:36 pm
Sorry, had to get that out So after finally getting things caught up here at law:/dev/null a couple weeks ago, I promptly disappeared again to focus on my upcoming competitions. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm
Petrovich Dev Co., a California appeals court ruled that e-mails sent by an employee to her attorney on an employer's computer were not confidential communications between a client and lawyer, for purposes of the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:17 am
See Kaiser Hawaii Kai Dev. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:21 am
It is the “dev” version, so many features don’t work yet and/or are buggy.It works on most Windows and Macs with an Intel or fairly recent AMD processor. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
City Model and Talent Dev., 09-22233 U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Petron Dev. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:56 pm
In early March, in the administrative appeal in state court, the court issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Order Reversing and Vacating the State of Hawaii Land Use Commission's Final Order, DW Aina Lea Dev. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:54 am
” Plaintiff also agrees and argues, “[ w ]hile privity of contract is generally necessary to state a cause of action for attorney malpractice, liability is extended to third parties, not in privity, for harm caused by professional negligence in the presence of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances,” citing Ginsburg Dev. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:00 am
DOT & Dev. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
Dev. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:40 am
& Dev. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:21 pm
See also Berkeley Dev. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Endnotes 1See PCAOB Release No. 2022-002, available at https://pcaob-assets.azureedge.net/pcaob-dev/docs/default-source/rulemaking/docket042/pcaob-other-auditors-adopting-release-6-21-2022.pdf? [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Muss Dev. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The Court further found the Short Form Environmental Assessment undertaken by the Village Board, in purported accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and prior to their adoption of the demapping and discontinuance resolution, to be wholefully inadequate and not meeting the “hard look” and “reasoned elaboration” standards set forth in Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
See Crown Point Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:53 pm
James AME Dev. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:32 pm
In analyzing this claim, the court looked to the ordinance in question, the Durham Unified Dev. [read post]
25 May 2010, 1:28 pm
Palms Dev. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:35 pm
See Destiny USA Dev., LLC v. [read post]
