Search for: "v. Atkins" Results 841 - 860 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
v=VIDEOID You’ll find a string of characters where VIDEOID is. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:43 am by Alicia Maule
Supreme Court barred the execution of people with intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Megan Ruth Atkins, A037 235 310 (BIA Mar. 15, 2016) (2016 WL 1357963) - The BIA dismissed respondent’s appeal of the IJ’s decision denying respondent’s motion to terminate proceedings and holding that the respondent committed an aggravated felony. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Megan Ruth Atkins, A037 235 310 (BIA Mar. 15, 2016) (2016 WL 1357963) - The BIA dismissed respondent’s appeal of the IJ’s decision denying respondent’s motion to terminate proceedings and holding that the respondent committed an aggravated felony. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Justice Leveson notes, the question of the relationship between the right of reply and Article 10 was considered by the Court of Human Rights in the case of Melnychuk v Ukraine (Decision of 5 July 2005). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
The respondents pointed out that in AAA v Associated Newspapers  and Weller v Associated Newspapers; children have been awarded damages despite being oblivious to their privacy rights being violated. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
 Pix Credit hereI wanted to take this opportunity to circulate a discussion draft of an essay, entitled "Legal Semiotics, Globalization and Governance. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
I arrived at the SEC in October 2006 to serve as counsel to Commissioner Paul Atkins. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]