Search for: "California v. Law" Results 8581 - 8600 of 33,836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Other Principles Guiding Court’s Exercise of Discretion  §1.30   In addition to the guidelines of Greyhound Corp. v Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 383, 15 CR 90, several other principles are well established in California discovery law:     * A legal basis must exist for the trial court’s discretion. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:58 pm by LaBovick Law
I read interesting post on the Law Blawg: California Attorneys Fees, entitled, Special Fee Shifting: Qui Tam Claimant Whacked With $300,000 Fee Award Under Arizona Fee Shifting Statute Did Not Obtain Reversal. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:13 pm by Erik Gerding
Last year we introduced a new feature at this blog called the Masters Forum, in which we invited a regular roster of law professors to comment on breaking issues such as the Jones v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Kermit might not find it easy being green, but everyone's favorite frog obviously wrote that song before he started following Environmental Law on JD Supra - a stream of daily updates from some of the finest lawyers and law firms in the field. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
Whitworth Professor of Law at Georgetown Law; Michele Bratcher Goodwin, Chancellor’s Professor of Law at the University of California-Irvine; Melissa Murray, Frederick I. and Grace Stokes Professor of Law at New York University;  Brad Snyder, Professor of Law and Anne Fleming Research Professor at Georgetown; and John Q. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
You Can’t Mandate How I Use My Privacy Toolbox, The University of Illinois Timely Tech online journal (September, 2017), Evisa Kambellari, University of Tirana Binary Governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s Approach to Algorithmic Accountability, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 92 [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Justin Driver
This legislative background has, in recent years, motivated some law professors to dismiss Plyler v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:41 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The court ruled that California’s wage and hour laws only apply to employers who actually control wages and workplace conditions, not ostensibly. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by Lior Strahilevitz
  For example, in 1986 the California Supreme Court held in Long Beach City Employees Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
One of the great things about reading the pages of the California Appellate Reports is that you learn new things. [read post]