Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 6:23 am
USA v Struckman. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:17 pm
In Commonwealth of Virginia v Sibelius, he granted summary judgment to the Commonwealth and denied the government's cross-motion. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:08 am
The Texas Supreme Court recently decided JPMorgan Chase Bank v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Here are the materials in Fletcher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 3:31 am
Japp v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
I opened Angela Tyson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm
The controversial case deals with the import of low-enriched uranium (LEU); U.S. utilities send the the un-enriched uranium to the French company Eurodif, paying for the "service" of enrichment. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:17 pm
Boyce Iron Works, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
In Kimble v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
Another precondition is the absence of self-dealing. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
Bowman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:38 pm
The case is Betsy Dieujuste v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
Gaskill v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
It seems like a very lucrative (and relatively easy) crime, at least as compared to your traditional drug dealing, bank robbery, etc. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:33 pm
It matters not that the defendant had no idea whatsoever that he was dealing with an undercover agent from San Diego -- or else he wouldn't have committed the crime with him (duh!) [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 1:51 pm
Perhaps most impressive is that it deals fairly and equitably with a case (1) in which the overall sleaze factor is relatively high (e.g., lots and lots of Machiavellian manipulation of the rules and "gotcha" litigation tactics), and (2) in which it's extremely uncertain which side has the better of the argument, and in which the stakes are relatively high.I thought that the opinion was worth reading even before I got to the discussion of the merits. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Just like I'm pretty sure you didn't inherit a great deal of money and that Bush didn't threaten to fire the Supreme Court over your "case". [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:04 pm
For example, in an otherwise nonremarkable opinion, the Ninth Circuit recites the following plea colloquy in a case in which the deal was that defendant would plea guilty and waive his right to appeal. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
Filed under: antitrust, economics, exclusionary conduct, exclusive dealing, monopolization [read post]
