Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 68,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington granting State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Jun. 26, 2008), the court reversed an order granting nationwide class certification of "a class of citizens who have been delayed in reentering the United States from abroad as a result of watch lists maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:50 pm
Review Granted Ceja v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
It stated that ‘it would be contrary to the rule of law … for a discretion granted to the executive in the sphere of national security to be expressed in terms of unfettered power’ [para 247]. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:28 pm
In Tirado V. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:44 am
”The Chancellor explained that his opinion was consistent with possible scenarios proffered by Vice Chancellor Strine in Desimone v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:50 pm
The plaintiff in this case, Levitt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:15 am
The Court granted certiorari on December 11, 2020.AG argument. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
§ 1252(f)(1) precluded the lower courts from granting injunctive relief, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Reno v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm
I speak here of the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering dispute (Moore v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:31 am
As a result, the State has failed to meet the heightened standard for a preliminary injunction . . . .' "The district court set out the standard for granting a preliminary injunction, determined that the requested injunction required a heightened showing of the four factors, and then indicated that it did not find Oklahoma's two expert witnesses on the source of bacterial pollutants in the IRW to be sufficiently credible. . . [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:50 pm
This trend continued recently, when the Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]