Search for: "In Interest of Doe" Results 8581 - 8600 of 135,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2007, 3:30 am
Does anyone else get the feeling that The Daily Texan student reporters are having a ball covering the University of Texas Office of Student Financial Services scandal? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:02 am
  As far as concerns the balance which a national court must strike between the exclusive rights of the author and freedom of expression, the Court underlines that the protection of intellectual property rights is not absolute and that it is necessary, where appropriate, to take into account the fact that the nature of the ‘speech’ or information at issue is of particular importance, notably in political discourse and discourse concerning matters of the public… [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:27 pm by Alka Bahal
 USCIS is required to adhere to the legislative requirement that the expansion of premium processing does not result in an increase in processing times for immigration benefit requests not designated for premium processing or an increase in regular processing of immigration benefit requests so designated. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:21 pm by Jim Chen
Seton Hall Law Review SymposiumOctober 30, 2009Seton Hall Law SchoolNewark, NJSecurities Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis: What Does the Future Hold? [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
Thus, with regards to real property, before an entity assigned an interest in that property would be entitled to receive a distribution from the sale of that property, their interest therein must have been recorded in accordance with Ohio law …… In each of the (cases herein), the named Plaintiff alleges it is the holder and owner of the Note and Mortgage. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
Seton Hall Law Review SymposiumOctober 30, 2009Seton Hall Law SchoolNewark, NJSecurities Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis: What Does the Future Hold? [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:40 am
Chris Hogg does a great job of capturing the metrics of the Twitter discussion that occurred during the recent Health 2.0 Boston conference. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 9:04 am by Bill Marler
Food Safety News does not take a vacation, nor does it take time off to attend this or that summer conference. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
I'm also not sure that the dual-consumer perspective does much to combat post-sale confusion, that doctrine used to condemn knockoffs that are obviously not the original at the point of sale. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
From time to time, the SEC reiterates its view of the critical gatekeeper role companies’ outside directors play in safeguarding investors’ interests. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This logic derives from cases holding the government has a substantial interest in regulating community aesthetics and preventing "undue annoyance. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 3:32 am
While the Arias Court concluded that actual litigation of a PAGA claim is binding on all interested parties (including both employees and the State), the Arias Court seemingly knocked out the fundamental premise of the Deleon Court's holding by concluding that "an action to recover civil penalties ‘is fundamentally a law enforcement action designed to protect the public and not to benefit private parties.'" (Arias, 46 Cal. 4th… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
He and a team of his colleagues wrote an informative and interesting piece in the March 2010 Gonzaga Law Review called "A Statistical Analysis of Trade Secret Litigation in Federal Courts. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303, 316 (1998); nor does Chambersundermine a state’s “broad latitude . . . to establish rules excluding evidence from criminal trials. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Fixed products are those in which the insurer decides (based on a number of factors) what interest rate to credit its policies; these plans include a guaranteed minimum interest rate, and are regulated by the states. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Margaret McCaffery
Does the spokesperson want to be called out of meetings to take media calls? [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
Moreover, where an attorney is prohibited from representing a client pursuant to RPC 1.7 or RPC 1.9, the prohibition applies to all members of the attorney’s firm “unless the prohibition is based on a personal interest of the prohibited [attorney] and does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client by the remaining [attorneys] in the firm. [read post]