Search for: "In re Richard A" Results 8581 - 8600 of 10,346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 7:19 am
Labour's justice spokesman Richard Baker led the criticism claiming it was a "huge blow" to government plans to scrap sentences of six-month or less. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:21 am
" Indeed, in the circa 1993 case that produced the preceding quote, In re Sauer, the TTAB upheld a refusal to register "BO BALL" (and design) for a ball on the ground that "BO" corresponded to the nickname of athlete Bo Jackson, that consumers would draw a connection between Bo Jackson and the "BO BALL" ball, and that Bo Jackson had not given written consent to use his (nick)name. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Now you're worried about the mistakes you made that you didn't have time to correct. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:10 pm
You're not making an indie film for the Sundance Film festival. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
If you're one of the 80% of Americans that file on time, you're already ahead of the game. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:57 am
In an injunction hearing Tuesday, the professors' lawyer, Richard L. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
However, taped transcripts of phone conversations with Chief Deputy Attorney General Kirk Torgensen and Deputy Attorney General Richard Hamp revealed Byrne's scheme with Shurtleff to defame and discredit me (Details here).Judd Bagley posts innuendo, smears, and lies about my divorce in an effort to discredit meMost recently, I have been embroiled in a divorce with my former spouse. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 2:16 pm
We're sure Holland & Knight will be thrilled by the extra rain. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
The IRS gets so many of them that as long as you’re paying your taxes it’s not a big deal. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:32 pm
Depending on when you're reading this, that gives you a few precious moments to get your taxes out before the deadline. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
 The SPC Blog's informants -- Richard Ebbink and Mark van Gardingen, Brinkhof -- mentioned that the court's decision contained many references in the decision to the 4 May 2007 decision of Mr Justice Kitchin of the Patents Court for England and Wales [noted here by the IPKat], with which decision the Dutch Court "respectfully disagreed".The IPKat has since heard from Jaap J.E. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 1, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming sex harass award of $466K+ and $291K atty feesDC Circuit In Re: DC Water And Sewer Authority, No. 08-7099 (D.C. [read post]