Search for: "Line v. People" Results 8581 - 8600 of 13,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  His instinct is that noncommerciality is a good line for default. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
I’m happy to visit the sun for 2 weeks but I don’t want to stay there, although Spain is proving mightily attractive all round for people in my line of work. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to identify clear dividing lines between proportionate and disproportionate interference. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:33 pm
It's not improper for a prosecutor to assert (in closing argument and elsewhere) that the defendant "brought a gun to a fistfight" when the defendant essentially did, in fact, bring a gun to a fistfight.So holds the Court of Appeal.Referencing famous movie lines: Not just for outside the courtroom. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am by The Charge
  That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
Censorship exists for the good of the people! [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Rather, it reaffirms that we are not just a nation of immigrants but a frugal people as well. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:42 pm
  Fear not:  Mecano's (presumably) no longer with the LAPD, since he's going to spend four years in prison.Justice Aldrich's opinion contains this line regarding one of the victims:  "Crying, she called Ben and told him that she'd let Mecano do things to her, and she felt dirty. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
Regardless of the outcome of the case between Capitol Records and ReDigi (Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm by Graham Smith
  He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am by David Oscar Markus
 The NY Times says that oral argument seemed split along ideological lines: The Supreme Court appeared divided along familiar lines on Monday as it heard arguments over whether Arizona can require proof of citizenship from people seeking to register to vote in federal elections. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
As a preliminary matter, I can’t help but reflect for a moment on how we got to where we are: Most people, I think, do not have a quarrel with the bottom-line conclusions and results. [read post]