Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 29,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm
"(93) The defendants appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court as part of the four case litigation encompassed in Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:50 am
On May 25, 2011, the Pennsylvania State Police conducted a planned traffic stop of Freed. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
As NRA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:31 am
In April, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 4:21 am
” Alleman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
District Judge Denny Chin has ruled in Stern v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:36 am
In an alimony case captioned Speigner v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:30 pm
The unanimous decision in Young v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
In Reading Area Water Authority v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:10 am
In a division of property and assets case captioned Roth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 12:19 am
Maska v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
In Mantle v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
Roberts, Jr.’s opinion for the Court in another 2010 decision, Holder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:35 am
Chris Clayton, of the DTN Ag Policy Blog reports that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld the lower court ruling in Been v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
” Applying dictionary definitions to the term “lodging,” the Court of Appeals stated that it is defined as “[a] place to live,” or “accommodations in a house, esp. in rooms for rent[.] [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:00 pm
See McDonald v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
See Bauer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
What kind of bizarro world do we live in where a near majority of Justices of the United States Supreme Court criticizes a First Amendment ruling for being overly concerned with “the individual’s right to engage in political speech”? [read post]