Search for: "Michaels v State"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 13,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 9:11 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Preliminary question: does applicant own copyright it is seeking to enforce: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (LawFont) Canada Canadian copyright collecting agency subverting open debate on copyright (Boing Boing) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) CMEC seeks review of K-12 Copyright Board tariff (Excess Copyright) The return of Captain Copyright? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
Like many other tributes, the case of A v Secretary of State for the Home Department is cited, including the famous observation: the judges in this country are not elected and are not answerable to Parliament … the function of independent judges charged to interpret and apply the law is universally recognised as a cardinal feature of the modern democratic state, a cornerstone of the rule of law itself. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
And now, in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
In fact I think these lawyers ought to pay State Farm after Hurricane Wilma wrecked their clients' home and then State Farm low-balled them by $80 grand.United Auto v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
” Welcome, Michael, and thank you for participating in this question-and-answer exchange. * * * “Have you got any candidates? [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Duncan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm
As he said in the first paragraph of his opinion,It is the policy of the State of Ohio that the State follows its written execution protocol, except when it does not. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
State & Michael Rippo v State, holding, respectively, that the state's so-called McConnell rule ("that it is unconstitutional to base an aggravating circumstance on the same felony upon which a felony murder is predicated") is retroactively applicable to all cases and subject to harmless-error analysis.As always, thanks for reading. - k [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses FCC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(Michael Geist) China Beijing Number One Intermediate People’s Court rules Microsoft violates Chinese companies IP rights in case over fonts (China Hearsay) (China Law Blog) (PC World) China domain name scams. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(China Law Blog) Columbia .co registry heads for IRT rights protection mechanisms (IP tango) Denmark Pirate Bay uploader raided by anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe European ACTA document leaks with new details on Mexico talks and future meetings (Michael Geist) ECJ: Sabam v Scarlet and ISP filters (1709 Copyright Blog) Want a dot.eu? [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(China Law Blog) Columbia .co registry heads for IRT rights protection mechanisms (IP tango) Denmark Pirate Bay uploader raided by anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe European ACTA document leaks with new details on Mexico talks and future meetings (Michael Geist) ECJ: Sabam v Scarlet and ISP filters (1709 Copyright Blog) Want a dot.eu? [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:08 am
” Michael P. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Heller in 2008, and McDonald v. [read post]