Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 9,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
The same court that recently defied the United States Supreme Court dismissed in a three-page, fact-less, analysis-free opinion an appeal by lawyers for a convicted murderer who, like any one of us accused (or convicted) of murder, has a right to a fair trial by unbiased and professional agents of the government. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(RelatIP) United Kingdom Tweaks to the UK patent system (IPKat) UK IPO announces 100th Patent Office Opinion issued since s74A – or is it 98? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
Cheerleading as a Sport under Title IX Approximately half of the U.S. states have already recognized high school cheerleading under Title IX.[11] Cheerleading has grown significantly in popularity among women, almost 25%, since 2000.[12] Cheerleading’s largest barrier to achieving… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:09 pm
United States) just a couple of months ago. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: French National Assembly passes new 3 strikes anti-piracy bill (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC affirms jury verdict that Microsoft’s Outlook software infringed Alcatel-Lucent patent, but finds jury award of $357.6 million damages unreasonable: Lucent Technologies, Inc… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
(Here is audio of the September 9 argument in that campaign spending case, Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Gerlich v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
On Huffington Post, Jay Wexler discusses the upcoming case Salazar v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:03 am
” Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
” Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
The Queen (on the Application of AB) v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Amgen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
“Habeas rights under the United States Constitution,” government lawyers argued in a 64-page legal brief, “do not extend to anemy aliens detained in the active war zone at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
becomes pages ill. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
NO-FAULT - MANDAMUS RELIEF - CPLR ARTICLE 78 Matter of Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v. [read post]
