Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 12,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:13 am
Via the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, Indiana has "undone" the ruling of its Supreme Court in Barnes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
CBS and Valentine v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
In the case of New Mexico v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Teleflex Patent from KSR v Teleflex In KSR v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Both state and federal courts in New York favor deciding cases on the merits. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
Growth: There was no pre-cooling step to remove field heat from the cantaloupes before cold storage. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 4:41 am
WCAB (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Police) , 11 A.3d 48 (2011), the injured worker, Washington, was employed as a Field Trooper with the State Police. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
Innovention Toys, LLC, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
The impact of this case has wide implications involving contractor liability, retroactive legislation, inability to assess risks; not only that, it opens the field for other states to re-establish liability on construction professionals long after fairness–or even state statute! [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
ARI has carried out several study programs in the field of sounding rocket’s capabilities and applications, their payloads and [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
The Report notes that the field is evolving and that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is fuelling a paradigm shift in thinking around how the state responds to persons with mental health problems. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Stone (1936), ‘The Common Law in the United States’ 5. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm
Hofstra paid out $485,000 and a federal judge approved the settlement last November, in Summa v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:01 pm
The network will share methods and experiences but also assist the Commission and Member States in preventing terrorism. [read post]