Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
Thus, this bill would overrule the California Supreme Court in Chavez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
Prescription Billing Errors Nature of the problem: Prescription billing errors — even small ones — can have significant consequences for specialty pharmacies. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Should we go green for the Waxman-Markey bill? [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:01 am
Totten v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 pm
Justice Thomas pointed out that a bill is currently pending in Congress which is directly relevant to the issues. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The diagnosis is codified by several states, including the California legislature under its Health and Safety Code as “a medically serious, sometimes fatal, matter affecting newborns and very young children,” and is generally prosecuted as a form of child abuse. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:52 am
In Intepros, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:00 am
The 11th Circuit also cited Supreme Court precedent in Reno v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Any bills 2. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:31 am
CARLA BURDETTE v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 6:08 am
" In this state, he would act act impulsively and get into verbal confrontations. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
Looks like the Tar Heel State's Blues could give the security-flawed 404Care.gov site a run for its money. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Including the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Canadian Union Of Public Employees, Local 79 v Toronto (City), 2017 CanLII 53965 (ON LA) [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Mais v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Mais v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Mais v. [read post]
