Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8581 - 8600 of 15,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Oyama: Notice and takedown is the best for that, b/c copyright owners know what they own and they know where they’ve authorized it. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Sec. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) was supported by substantial evidence (Circle C Resources, Inc v Kobielusz, March 11, 2014, Burke, J). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am by Eleonora Rosati
 This is the case of the UK, where the relevant provision is s.1(1) of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, which so states: "Copyright is a property right which subsists ... in the following descriptions of work— (a) original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works, (b) sound recordings, films or broadcasts, and (c) the typographical arrangement of published editions." [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Senator Stanford’s vision may soon be realized if two members of of the California Assembly have their legislative way." [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:06 am by Jon Gelman
Further studies on histological subtypes and the analysis of other potentially relevant factors are crucial for discovering putative mechanisms The report:  Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch B, Pallapies D, Lotz A, Justenhoven C, Baisch C,Schiffermann M, Haas S, Fischer H-P, Heinze E, Pierl C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Ko Y,Brüning T, "Night work and breast cancer estrogen… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am by Ana
 Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25, came into force on March 18, 2013, and replaced the province’s 32-year-old Family Relations Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Judge Alsup’s dismissal was without prejudice to plaintiff’s attempt to file in state court, and Ms. [read post]