Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 8581 - 8600 of 10,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Minnesota also relied on the Eighth Circuit's 2023 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
In the November ETS, OSHA cites the broad language of § 6(b)(5) and its previous regulation of workplace exposure to HIV and hepatitis B through the 1991 Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens Final Rule (the “1991 Standard”) as evidence of its authority to regulate “biological hazards like [COVID-19] as health hazards under section 6(b)(5). [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The average percentage of votes cast for E&S proposals was 20% in 2023, compared to 37% in 2021.[32] Only 3% of E&S proposals received a majority of votes cast in 2023, compared to 23% in 2021.[33] C. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Consequently, it would have been impossible to manually carry out the method steps, including the above steps (a) to (c) and (e). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
”  This flirts with overturning the 1984 Ohio Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; e-mail vamodeo@cpsc.gov; telephone 301-504-7570.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:I. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am by Nicholas Gebelt
§ 6015(b)(1)(E) has a chronological requirement as well:  You must request innocent spouse relief no later than two years after the date the IRS first attempted to collect the tax from you. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? [read post]