Search for: "State v. House" Results 8581 - 8600 of 28,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by J
Parts are "common" if they are for shared, rather than individual benefit: Marfield Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment [1996] SCLR 749. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
To determine which takings offend these international standards, we have historically turned, in part, to House Report 94-1487 on the FSIA legislation. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Additionally, the state's House and Senate passed a criminal code revision bill that has some good elements but may ultimately increase the state's prison population significantly. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
When the severed family requires financial or housing assistance, state resources are strained. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
Flores, et al., 08-289, and Arizona House Speaker, et al., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
  Further, four members of the House of Lords in OBG Ltd v Allen had emphasized the need to confine the tort within careful limits. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:13 am by Kirk Jenkins
Like most states, Illinois is in the early stages of transitioning to an e-filing system in its state courts. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state House of Representatives has already passed the bill, but it now goes back to the House because of two changes in wording made by the Senate. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am by Adam Wagner
In interviews with housing officers, she complained of her husband’s behaviour, which included shouting in front of the children, and stated that she was scared that if she confronted him he might hit her. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31894, March 1, 2011), and permitted plaintiff, who was housed at a state hospital as a sexually violent predator, to move ahead with his challenge to the hospital's refusal to permit him to attend church services when he had his access level reduced for 29 days.In Riley v. [read post]