Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 28,972
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
The Labor Department also says employee misclassification also generates substantial losses to state and federal treasuries, and to the Social Security and Medicare funds, as well as to state unemployment insurance and workers compensation funds. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:14 pm
The Court’s decision in Veterans Contracting Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
In light of the availability of other defenses, franchisor employers should assess whether the joint employer risk is worth accepting in order to pursue the single enterprise defense. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
But here’s the twist: This new, scientifically-driven awareness of the problem of false confessions has emerged only in the decades since the United States Supreme Court last visited the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ voluntariness doctrine in 1991’s Arizona v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:27 am
Rizo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The post Update: Stone Brewing v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
"Gray v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:01 am
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
(For one example, see Illinois v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Basra v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:25 pm
Additional Resources: Pavik v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:25 pm
Additional Resources: Pavik v. [read post]
