Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
A fairly remarkable example is Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The problem with such evidence, photographs or videos that do not have a person that took the photograph or video to authenticate it, is that the evidentiary foundation required for a photo or video to be entered in to evidence is that the person that took the photo or video would need to testify as to what exactly the photo or video represents and when it was taken.As the video camera in this case was a motion activated camera that was installed in a high school, there is no… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 5:17 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
As discussed in our most recent blog, extensive evidence was offered to show that the plaintiff in Stewart v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
An assessment of whether the power has been exercised properly is therefore necessarily subjective and dependent of the state of mind of the persons exercising the power. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The name of the Missouri case is Keeley v. [read post]
CA3: Police were objectively reasonable in entering a house they thought was abandoned but it wasn't
8 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The second case, Riley v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:23 am
Facts: This products liability case (Ruggiero v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:23 am
Facts: This products liability case (Ruggiero v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:38 am
In Palsgaard v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 10:36 am
Ct 2551 (2015), the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm
(First Amendment; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act; Security Threat Group) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Jeremiah Sipp v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:13 am
The Court reasoned that the personal assistants were subject to the control of the private patients since the patients maintained control b b hiring, firing, training and supervising of the employee.Harris v Quinn, No. 11-681 (Sp. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:16 am
While the State HRL states that punitive damages are available only in cases of employment discrimination and housing discrimination, the City law contains language stating:Except as otherwise provided by law, any person claiming to be a person aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice as defined in chapter 1 of this title ... shall have a cause of action in any court of competent jurisdiction for damages, including punitive damages.That language is found… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:39 am
") AC35996 - State v. [read post]
