Search for: "State v. Price" Results 8581 - 8600 of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 11:38 am by mpeters
       According to the complaint in Kickflip Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia—ruling that the dealer presented sufficient evidence of horizontal and vertical price fixing to send the matter to the jury—appears in a June 26, 2008 posting on Trade Regulation Talk. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:55 am by Katherine Simone
Condominium associations are controlled by the covenants and conditions outlined in their governing documents, as well as their respective state statutes[1] and common law. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm by Elie Mystal
I mean, the cost of law school is completely out of control, prospective law students have proven that they’ll pay any price for any thing. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Keith L. Miller
  The Court further stated that the firm had a duty at least to discuss whether a due diligence inquiry would be performed. http://Mitchell Barack v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The TTAB disagreed, stating that “Consumers, like competitors, may have a real interest in keeping merely descriptive or generic words in the public domain. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The timing of the SEC's decision is interesting because the Supreme Court's pending decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
The new US Department of Justice antitrust leader says antitrust enforcers are too accommodating to IP implementers when in dispute with standard-essential patent owners. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But the government can indeed control the speech of its subordinate entities, without being constrained by the Free Speech Clause: A state government can control its political subdivisions, and a local government can control local agencies, see, e.g., Ysursa v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]