Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 13,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
Estimates of price or value placed on the subject of a transaction and a party’s intentions as to an acceptable settlement of a claim are ordinarily in this category, and so is the existence of an undisclosed principal except where nondisclosure of the principal would constitute fraud. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
In Kerala Financial Corpn. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:38 am
Many argue that the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 are draconian in nature. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:08 pm
Price has posted 'Bull' Coming from the States: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Williams v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
” US v Brandon Lee Price – Federal Criminal Complaint US v Brandon Lee Price – Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
The Supreme Court put an end to this strategy when it decided the international price-fixing case, Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
., Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:48 pm
State Health Insurance Exchanges to certify acceptable policies and their premiums, and advise consumers, might be unable to compare the prices of apples and oranges. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm
Simmonds v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
The IPKat has an acute dislike of legal actions that look destined to fail and which unnecessarily prolong the state of hostilities between the parties. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Frye, Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
