Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 43,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:56 pm
On this record, the Tax Court was correct in concluding that the percentage of likely potential gain did not infuse economic substance into what was clearly a tax loss scheme. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:30 am
Georgia is just one of five American states that use purely digital voting without any paper record. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:55 pm
The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated; and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals for reconsideration in light of United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
The ruling in Anonymous v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:25 pm
That was the case in State of Missouri v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:08 pm
See Kolesnikoff v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
In case you missed it, here is a recording of the webinar. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:31 am
Read v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm
The documents within record the words and actions of key players in the political life of the United States, and thus reflect the mindset of the era. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
One such reason was raised during the trial of Karen Weil (State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 3:27 am
Swatch AG v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
” [via FindLaw] State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:04 pm
In Kirby et al v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
